
Dear Reader,
Word Raccoon and I have been thinking about the function of punctuation in creative writing.Â
I think of it as playful and jazzy, especially in poems. And yet, punctuation changes the meaning of words.Â
In a poem, I allow Word Raccoon to dance along and sprinkle periods, semicolons, colons, whatever, where she pleases because in truth, (can you tell Iâve been reading Twelfth Night?) a little ambiguity never hurt a poem and probably helped quite a few. It gives the reader a job, the equivalent of âbut what did that emoji mean?â when reading a slightly confusing text.
Itâs an invitation to dance, to re-enter the poem as many times as it takes to understand it better. Nonstandard punctuation can serve as a carrot (letâs say chocolate, shall we?) to our readers.Â
Punctuation gives the stage directions: stop here because Iâm certain or I donât want to say more. Continue, knowing these ideas are closely related or I do not want to yield the floor and thus I will ask for your attention by continuing with yet another, smaller, connective device. Or, I donât know and Iâm telling you so; feel free to think alongside me here.Â
Punctuation is the foundation of the poemâs rhythm. You might think the syllables are that, and sure, but the syllables are like dancers whose movements are dependent on the one-two-three of the punctuation.Â
Word Raccoon, considering you ran through much of this last night while I was trying to sleep, this is kinda sloppy.Â
She says she does not care. She wants it out of her head so she can enter the Shakespeare discussion with a clearer head. Personally, I think she should think this through a bit more.
I confess to having developed a system all my own without intending to. (And have you SEEN Dickinsonâs punctuation usage?) Iâm not sure I could tell you just what without analyzing it, but I know I have.Â
Words provide the shared images and sensory information to transfer meaning. Without a shared vocabulary, we have no meaning. And yet punctuation guides, paces, and invites the reader to participate in ways that are freer than the traditional meaning of words.Â
I have long been fascinated with stream-of-consciousness writing. First Faulkner (which boggled my young mind at first), then Woolf. For a time in my twenties, I wrote nothing but, in part because I wanted to understand it.Â
The method spoke to the breathless way I prefer to discuss things, watching ideas birth new ones before even landing. Itâs like rapping, maybe. Riffing. Improvisation.Â
And yet, because the mind is singular and its thoughts circle a center of intellect (WR is saying ooh, look at us writing intellect before 9 am. Or is it AM? Or a.m.?)Â
Perhaps my writing has been formed more by my love of stream of consciousness than Iâd care to think. In it, punctuation is uncertain, changing, guiding, but not prescriptive.Â
I invite you to read my punctuation freely. Mostly.Â
DremaÂ









You must be logged in to post a comment.