
Dear Reader,
Iāve mentioned verticals before, and here we are again. Word Raccoon and I want to do more research into those microdramas that take the heat and drama and turn them up to eleven in very short videos, often only a minute or two long per episode.
Or, in our case, if we end up writing any, MicroDremasā¢. šš
The vertical drama machine is lusting for:
Secrets. Status reversals. Hidden identities. Class differences. Inheritances. People overhearing things they absolutely should not have heard.
We have been training for this by reading nineteenth-century novels for YEARS, WR!
Maybe the opportunity isnāt for me to stop being a literary writer long enough to write verticals. Maybe being a literary writer could be the helpful thing I bring to verticals.
Well.
Obviously Word Raccoon and I are not announcing that this is all weāre going to write now. We like to write everything. But we do think verticals are an intriguing possibility, and weāve begun wondering whether there might be room in the form for adaptations of classic literature.
In my mind, itās a little like adapting a novel into a graphic novel. If youāve ever fallen in love with that form, youāll understand that itās not the same thing as reading the original novel, but it does coexist in the same universe.
And sometimes all we want is a whiff of the novel, either for smelling or sharing.
So this is the beginning of my journey into verticals. Other than having watched some and heard them discussed on a podcast, I know very little. Thereās a Substack newsletter devoted to them that I signed up for, although I have to confess that I havenāt read any of it yet.
Iām telling you: beginning of the journey.
But this is 2026. If I can bring something of myself to a new form and perhaps bring a (very) little of my literary sensibility to it, why not?
And that is not a criticism of verticals. It means that new forms can be fashioned and shaped to appeal to more than one kind of viewer.
For me, one of the most compelling things about them is that just when youāre engrossed, the episode is finished and youāre like, NOOOO! You just have to watch the next one. HOW DO THEY DO THAT, WR? Letās find out!
Imagine hooking people on the classics like that. Although that brings up the question of what makes the classic a classic: is it the story or the language or both?
Oh my, WR, I think weāve had too much caffeine because I could riff on that and Iād love to hear othersā thoughts on it, too.
Thereās also the sometimes-teacherly part of me that immediately wonders: What if someone becomes fascinated by a vertical adaptation of a classic novel they otherwise would never have encountered, and then goes looking for the book?
Thatās one of the benefits I see of graphic novels, comic books based on classics, and the like. I think we have to be careful not to dismiss new forms too quickly, because those may be the very things that help keep what we love alive.
And classics are hardly strangers to heightened drama in the first place.
Secret inheritances?
Forbidden relationships?
Class differences?
People overhearing things they absolutely should not have heard?
Please. The Victorians would like a word.
But why stop there? Imagine taking, say, Madame Bovary and making her an influencer. Too easy, am I right?
A Room with a View? If the room was assigned to an influencer who could not live stream from her window if she did not have one? I think we know why she needs a window, am I right? And what if someone catches her kissing you-know-who on video?
I meanā¦
Obviously, my adaptations would not consist entirely of making nineteenth-century women influencers. š And the stories as written, even left intact, could be made extremely compelling in small snippets.
Although uh-oh, these could become the new Cliffsā Notes of our era.
Wait, what am I thinking? Thereās AI nowadays. Sigh.
What about taking a symbol from the novel, or a motif, and handing it through each scene? Mrs. Dalloway would have, what? Yes, flowers!
Of course weād be missing the beauty and mystery of the language, something that could not be duplicated. But this is not the same thing. A unicycle is not a bicycle. A bicycle is not a car. And so on. But they all get you somewhere.
So again, this is the beginning of my research and experimentation with verticals. (Is that word supposed to be capitalized in this case? See, too new for me to know.) These are only my opening thoughts. Iāll report back when I know more and/or have more to say.
Or when I have a script, which feels like more fun than I have time for at the moment.
Wish Word Raccoon and MicroDrema⢠luck, please.
Drema






You must be logged in to post a comment.